闵庆飞;季绍波;曲刚;

• 1:School of Management Dalian University of Technology
• 2:School of Management Dalian University of Technology
• 3:School of Management Dalian University of Technology
• 4:Dalian 116024 China

摘要(Abstract)：

User acceptance is one of the key fundamentals for development and success of mobile commerce (m-commerce). Based on the revised unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model, we described a theoretical framework that incorporates the unique characteristics of m-commerce to enhance our understanding of m-commerce acceptance and usage in China. The revised UTAUT includes the characteristics of m-commerce, inclusion and consideration of information system user satisfaction theory, and Chinese culture and context.

关键词(KeyWords)：

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 70602032)

作者(Authors): 闵庆飞;季绍波;曲刚;

参考文献(References)：

• [1] Urbaczewski A, Valacich J, Jessup M L. Mobile commerce: Opportunities and challenges. Communications of the ACM, 2003, 46(12): 31-32.
• [2] Sadeh N M. M-Commerce: Technologies, Services and Business Models. New York: Wiley & Sons, 2002.
• [3] Research Consulting. The market research report of mobile value-added service in China. http://www.iresearch.com.cn/, 2004. (in Chinese)
• [4] TouChingKM. The business model of content provider of mobile Internet and Japanese’s experience. http://www. 365u.com.cn/ZiLiao/, 2006. (in Chinese)
• [5] Jarvenppa S L, Lang K R, Takeda Y, Tuunainen V K. Mo- bile commerce at cross roads. Communications of the ACM, 2003, 46(12): 41-44.
• [6] Mylonopoulos N A, Doukidis G I. Mobile business: Tech- nological pluralism, social assimilation, and growth. Inter- national Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2003, 8(1): 5-22.
• [7] Blom J, Chipchase J, Lehikoinen J. Contextual and cul- tural challenges for user mobility research. Communica- tions of the ACM, 2005, 48(7): 37-41.
• [8] Okazaki S. New perspectives on m-commerce research. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 2005, 6(3): 160-164.
• [9] Hu P J, Chau P Y, Liu S K, et al. Examining the technol- ogy acceptance model using physician acceptance of tele- medicine technology. Journal of Management Information System, 1999, 16(2): 91-112.
• [10] Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behav- ior: An Introduction of Theory and Research. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
• [11] Davis F D. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end—User information systems: Theory and results. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Insti- tute of Technology, 1986.
• [12] Davis F D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and end user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 1989, 13(13): 318-339.
• [13] Venkatesh V, Davis F D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field stud- ies. Management Science, 2000, 45(2): 186-204.
• [14] Ajzen I, Madden T J. Prediction of goal directed behaviors: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1986, 22(5): 453-474.
• [15] Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. OrganizationalBehavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2): 179-211.
• [16] Venkatesh V, Morris M G, Davis G B, et al. User accep- tance of information technology: Towards a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 2003, 27(3): 425-478.
• [17] Taylor S, Todd P. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 1995, 6(2): 144-176.
• [18] Taylor S, Todd P. Assessing IT usage: The role of prior ex- perience. MIS Quarterly, 1995, 19(4): 561-570.
• [19] Malhotra A, Segars H A. Investigating wireless WEB adoption patterns in the US. Communications of the ACM, 2005, 48(10): 105-110.
• [20] Brown I, Cajee Z, Davies D, Stroebel S. Cell phone bank- ing: Predictors of adoption in South Africa—An explora- tory study. International Journal of Information Manage- ment, 2003, 23(5): 381-394.
• [21] Bruner G C, Kumar A. Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices. Journal of Business Research, 2005, 58(5): 553-558.
• [22] Wu Jenher, Wang Shuching. What drives mobile com- merce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 2005, 42(5): 719-729.
• [23] Teo T S H, Pok S H. Adoption of WAP-enabled mobile phones among Internet users. Omega, 2003, 31(6): 483- 498.
• [24] Fang X, Chan S, Brzezinski J, et al. Moderating effects of task type on wireless technology acceptance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2006, 22(3): 123-158.
• [25] Hung Shinyuan, Ku Chengyuan, Chang Chiaming. Critical factors of WAP services adoption: An empirical study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2003, 2(1): 42-60.
• [26] Luarn P, Lin Hsinhui. Toward an understanding of the be- havioral intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 2005, 21: 873-891.
• [27] Carlsson C, Carlsson J, Hyvonen K, et al. Adoption of mobile devices/services-searching for answers with the UTAUT. In: Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii, USA, 2006.
• [28] Knutsen L, Constantiou I D, Damsgaard J. Acceptance and perceptions of advanced mobile services: Alterations dur- ing a field study. In: Proceedings of the International Con- ference on Mobile Business. Sydney, Australia, 2005.
• [29] Zhang J J, Yuan Y. M-commerce versus Internet-based e- commerce: The key differences. In: Proceedings of the 8th Americas Conference on Information Systems. Dallas, USA, 2002: 1892-1901.
• [30] Heijden V D. User acceptance of hedonic information sys- tems. MIS Quarterly, 2004, 28(4): 695-704.
• [31] Siau K, Shen Z. Building customer trust in mobile com- merce. Communications of the ACM, 2003, 46(4): 91-94.
• [32] Bhattacherjee A. Individual trust in online firms: Scale de- velopment and initial test. Journal of Management Infor- mation Systems, 2002, 19(1): 211-241.
• [33] Wayne B D. Empirical investigation of the acceptance and intended use of mobile commerce: Location, personal pri- vacy and trust. USA: Mississippi State University, 2005.
• [34] Okazaki S. What do we know about mobile Internet adopt- ers? A cluster analysis. Information & Management, 2006, 43(2): 127-141.
• [35] Orlikowski W J, Iacono C S. Research commentary: Des- perately seeking the “IT” in IT research—A call to theoriz- ing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 2001, 12(2): 121-134.
• [36] Ives B, Olson M H, Baroudi J J. The measurement of user information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 1983, 26(10): 785-793.
• [37] Melone N. A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research. Management Science, 1990, 36(1): 76-91.
• [38] Wixom B H, Todd P A. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Sys- tems Research, 2005, 16(1): 85-102.
• [39] DeLone W H, McLean E R. Information system success: The quest for the dependent variables. Information Sys- tems Research, 1992, 3(1): 60-95.
• [40] Straub D, Keil M, Brenner W. Testing the technology ac- ceptance model across cultures: A three country study. In- formation and Management, 1997, 33(1): 1-11.
• [41] Harris P, Rettie R, Kwan C C. Adoption and usage of m- commerce: A cross-cultural comparison of Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. Journal of Electronic Commerce Re- search, 2005, 6(3): 210-224.
• [42] Zakour A B. Cultural differences and information technol- ogy acceptance. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual Confer- ence of the Southern Association for Information Systems. Savannah, USA, 2004: 156-161.
• [43] Chau P Y K, Cole M, Massey A, et al. Culture differences in consumer’s online behaviors. Communications of the ACM, 2002, 45(10): 138-143.
• [44] Hofstede G. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw Hill, 1997.
• [45] Martinsons M G, Westwood R I. Management information systems in the Chinese business culture: An explanatory theory. Information & Management, 1997, 32(5): 215-228.
• [46] Srite M, Karahanna E. The role of espoused national cul- tural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 2006, 30(3): 679-704.